Bought the album “Wilco” by Wilco. Worst. Decision. Ever. Even worse, than that time, when I was into German Trachtenmode and bought a 500 Euro traditional linen hunter’s janker (yes, I’m from Europe).
Have you heard the song “I’ll Fight”? Seriously, what the hell is going on there?
I’ll die alone like Jesus on a cross…
NO. YOU. WON’T.
Seriously, pretentiousness is ok and everything, but this is just bad taste.
What are the benefits of Euro addaption for the Baltic Countries?
Last week (17. VII 2009) the Governing Council of the European Central Bank had its semi-monthly meeting and published its decisions on the ECB website. One particulary interesting GC opinion (dating back to 24. VI 2009) was regarding the use of Latvijas Banka’s income (CON/2009/53).
Apparently, the latvians are willing to increase the amount of Latvijas Banka’s income, that can be used by the government from 15% to 50% in another hara-kiri type legislation, all in the name of addopting the Euro, the holy cow of any political discussion of the Latvian economy.
Apparently, the ECB isn’t really impressed by the idea. To quote:
“The ECB further notes that in principle it is not optimal for the central bank to create reserves only after transferring a large portion of its profits to the Treasury. Should Latvijas Banka run into a situation of negative equity in the future (i.e. losses exceeding currently accumulated reserves), it would be hard to rebuild it out of the stream of future ‘net’ earnings under such an arrangement. Although Latvijas Banka still had positive capital and reserves at the end of 2008, prudence is equired to ensure stable and sufficient financial resources in the long term.” (Section 3.2)
Latvia’s budget deficit for the first 5 months of 2009 totaled 395.21 million Lats (bbn) and I can only guess its development dynamic. Assuming, that Latvijas Banka has aproximately the same profit in 2009 as it did in 2008, the government could squeeze another 13,25 mil. Lats out of it until the end of this year.
A critical reader will at this point shout out in disgust: “Surely, you must be daft! Such assumptions are frivolous at best!” I wholeheartedly agree and apologize for picturing my dear critical reader in a top hat and with a south-english accent. However, the point is true: thinking that the latvian bank’s last year income is sustainable in these conditions isn’t thinking at all.
So the cost of the Euro dream is proving to be unmanageable and rather substantial, whereas I seldomly hear about the benefits of such a rapid transition to the Euro, that the Baltic States may reap (excluding the “It will magically save our economy and make us rich beyound our wildest dreams!” argument).
If there are any significant marginal benefits from the Euro, I welcome you to post a comment.
“ The crowd listening to Rafsanjani inside the mosque was filled with Ahmadinejad supporters who chanted, among other things, “Death to America” and “Death to China.” Outside the university common grounds, anti-Ahmadinejad elements — many of whom were blocked by Basij militiamen and police from entering the mosque — persistently chanted “Death to Russia. ”
STRATFOR Geopolitical Weekly, 07/21/2009
Is it the translation, or is the whole “World Peace”-thing not hip anymore?
“ There is a powerful role both for the market and for philanthropy…Philanthropy alone lacks the feedback mechanism of markets, which are the best listening devices we have; and yet markets alone too easily leave the most vulnerable behind. ”